2013 Schedule

  • 9/2 @Pitt
    9/7 Open
    9/14 NEVADA
    9/21 BETHUNE-COOKMAN
    9/28 @B.C.
    10/5 MARYLAND
    10/12 Open
    10/19 @Clemson
    10/26 N.C. STATE
    11/2 MIAMI
    11/9 @Wake
    11/16 SYRACUSE
    11/23 IDAHO
    11/30 @UF

Doak Weather

« Putting an end to the Leonard Hamilton to Illinois rumors | Main | Clemson O.C. Chad Morris on getting even more out of Sammy Watkins and his hyperactive offense »

March 29, 2012

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451bda469e201676463c5dd970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Thanks to Dabo for echoing our idea for a spring game with a real opponent:

Comments

Dennis Kirby

I agree that the game, once agreed upon, would HAVE to be set in stone no matter what. Smaller schools don't really have that much at stake in spring games as far as recruiting goes so a school like South Alabama or Troy would be ideal for both schools. And hey, since we'd be the home team and the economy in Tally would benefit, split the gate with the away school for charities or scholarships.

Dave

To add to that who is going to be the away team?

Every team wants to host a whole bunch of recruits for the spring game. It's a great recruiting tool.

How do you convince Auburn, UGA, Bama, LSU, etc. to come play at FSU?

Your best shot would be UCF, USF, FAU, FIU, etc and its not worth the loss of momentum if you happen to lose a glorified scrimmage to one of these "lesser" programs.

Dave

"He adds, by the way, that playing a real opponent in the spring would be an option for a program, not set in stone. A good out for a team hit by a rash of spring practice injuries."

Logistically, that is a nightmare. You don't find out about spring practice injuries until it would be way too late and inconvenient for both parties to change the game. Not to mention the derision you would catch for backing out of the game. If someone actually wants to make this happen alot more serious thought has to be put into it than the notion from a few coaches.

Would we end up with teams posturing for big spring games for recruiting? Would teams refuse to play other teams because of affiliations or unwillingness to give that team an "in" with recruits they want that the other team is leading for. Alot of stuff that would come up in CFB that you don't think about when you have a pure sense of the game as opposed to the ulterior motives.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been posted. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment